<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blog Comment Spamming &#8211; An Unethical Way To Drive Traffic To Your Website</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.trypm.com/blog/2010/03/09/blog-comment-spamming-an-unethical-way-to-drive-traffic-to-your-website/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.trypm.com/blog/2010/03/09/blog-comment-spamming-an-unethical-way-to-drive-traffic-to-your-website/</link>
	<description>A Blog About Marketing, Advertising, Web Design, SEO and other IT stuff ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 05:16:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Marshall</title>
		<link>http://www.trypm.com/blog/2010/03/09/blog-comment-spamming-an-unethical-way-to-drive-traffic-to-your-website/comment-page-1/#comment-808</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Marshall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 20:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trypm.com/blog/?p=65#comment-808</guid>
		<description>The tougher issue is whether to allow specific and original commentary that is nonetheless only there to give exposure to another site. Some web search optimization services send out the URL&#039;s of sites and tell their clients to log on and leave genuine comments. Some bloggers delete these too, regarding them as spam, just more sophisticated spam. My own policy: if the comment is really good and adds some useful content to the blog, then I will let it stay. That seems fair.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The tougher issue is whether to allow specific and original commentary that is nonetheless only there to give exposure to another site. Some web search optimization services send out the URL&#8217;s of sites and tell their clients to log on and leave genuine comments. Some bloggers delete these too, regarding them as spam, just more sophisticated spam. My own policy: if the comment is really good and adds some useful content to the blog, then I will let it stay. That seems fair.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

